← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19159/2025bail granted

Mukesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-16Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19159 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2024 Thana- Lakho District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Mukesh Sharma S/O Late Umesh Sharma R/O Village- Dhabauli Ward No.8, P.S- Lakho, Distt.- Begusarai.

2.

Sunny Sharma S/O Late Umesh Sharma R/O Village- Dhabauli Ward No.8, P.S- Lakho, Distt.- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-04-2025 Heard Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Ms. Madhuri Lata, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Lakho P.S. Case No. 178 of 2024 registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 74 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, accused persons named therein, along with the petitioners, had assaulted the informant and his family members.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and they have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19159 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 2/3 falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner no.1 assaulted one Pintu Kumar (Informant), who sustained injuries on his head and as per the opinion of the doctor, no significant abnormality was found in his brain. In respect of petitioner no.2, who had assaulted the mother of the informant, as per the opinion of the doctor, the injury sustained by the mother of the informant is not on the vital part of her body. The petitioners have clean antecedent. On these grounds, the petitioners seek to be released on bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on prearrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai/ concerned Court in connection with Lakho P.S. Case No. 178 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners, as stated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19159 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 3/3 paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioners, as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically. (Purnendu Singh, J.) Ashishsingh/- U T