← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19398/2025bail granted

Chunni Lal v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-16Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19398 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-787 Year-2024 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Chunni Lal Son of Rajendra Saw village- Takiaya Par, Gurudwara Road, Banpatti Tola, Ps- Danapur, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Prakash, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 16-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Danapur P.S Case No. 787 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2)/ 329(3), 115(2), 118, 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with the other accused persons have assaulted the informant and gave knife blow to the informant's brother due to which he was severely injured.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that petitioner is aged about 70 years and suffering from old age and in this situation it is not correct to say that he would

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19398 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 2/2 have given knife blow to informant's brother. Moreover, there is no injury report to prove the prosecution. It is also submitted that petitioner has surrendered himself in the court below when he came to know about the nature of allegation levelled against him. He further submits that petitioner is in judicial custody since 02.09.2024 having clean antecedent.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. On perusal of the FIR, impugned order dated 01.02.2025, it appears that no injury report has been produced from which the severity of the injury sustained by the informant's brother can be known. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case and also considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M-1 Danapur in connection with Danapur P.S Case No. 787 of 2024 (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) sunnykr/- U