Sanjulal @ Sanjulal Hansda v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57868 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Sanjulal @ Sanjulal Hansda S/o Late Pagla Hansda, R/o Vill.- Lilabaran, P.S. & District- Banka.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.T.No.127 of 2018 (Jhajha P.S.Case no.88 of 2017) registered for offences punishable under Sections 121, 121A, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 3/4 of Explosive Substance Act and Sections 16,17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 of U.A.P.Act.

Police received informant of assembly of the nexalites at a place and thereafter the police raided the place and one person was arrested and from him one A.K. 56 Rifle, two Magazines, electronic detonator and other articles were recovered and it is alleged that he has named the petitioner. The petitioner is named in the FIR.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been made accused on disclosure of the co-accused and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57868 of 2018 (2) dt.28-09-2018 2/2 there is no recovery from him. He is in custody since 19.2.2918. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Jamui in connection with S.T.No.127 of 2018 (Jhajha P.S.Case No.88 of 2017).

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T