Akash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20041 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2025 Thana- MOHIUDDIN NAGAR DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Akash Kumar S/o- Shiv Chandra Das R/v- Mohamadpur (Paswan Chauk W.No-9) Ps- Mohiuddinnagar Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bindeswari Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mohiuddinnagar P.S. Case No. 253 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 331(4), 305(a) of the BNS and later on Section 317(i) of the BNS was also added.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have committed theft in the dwelling house of the informant.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 9.12.2025.
5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20041 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 2/2 recovery of the stolen articles from the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court below in connection with Mohiuudinnagar P.S. Case No. 253 of 2025.
8. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at Mohiuudinnagar Police Station on every Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the police station will result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.
9. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U