← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21616/2023bail granted

Ranjan Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-06Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21616 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-454 Year-2006 Thana- KOTWALI District- Munger ====================================================== RANJAN KUMAR SINHA Son of Surendra Narayan R/o Ward No.- 11, College Road, Near Sona Cinema, Shokhara 2, P.S.- Shokhara, District - Begusarai, State - Bihar.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Bhola Prasad Son of Late Ganga Prasad R/o Village - Poorab Sarai, Near Durga Sthan, P.S.- Kotwali, District - Munger, State - Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.A Narayan, B.Sahay, R Ray, Advocates Mr. Chitranjan Kr.Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 406,419,420 & 423 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, petitioner and other coaccused person took consideration amount Rs.1,65,000/- for executing sale deed with respect to a piece of land in favour of the informant but later on neither did they execute the sale deed nor they return the consideration money to the informant. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the agreement for executing the sale deed was between the informant and co-accused Shailendra Narain Verma and no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21616 of 2023(2) dt.06-07-2023 2/2 money has ever been received by the petitioner in the alleged transaction. Moreover, informant had also filed Money suit No. 5/2009 which was withdrawn by him after receiving the entire consideration amount. Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case only because he happens to be brother of said co-accused. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger in Kotwali Police Station Case No. 454 of 2006/ GR No.1956 of 2006, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T