Babita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15411 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2019 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== BABITA DEVI, aged about 52 years, (Femal) W/o Late Manoj Singh, Resident of Kendua, P.S.-Muffasil, District -Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amresh Kumar Sinha, aAdv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand (APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-03-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct para 17 of the bail petition in course of the day. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 50 liters of illicit wine from the joint house of the petitioner and other family members. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she is innocent and has committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. She is a cook in a Government School. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 16.02.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15411 of 2019(2) dt.12-03-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 20 of 2019, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after her release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel her bail bonds.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T