Patna High CourtL.P.A/1452/2014dismissed

Sonelal Raut v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-03Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

Patna High Court LPA No.1452 of 2014 (3) dt.03-05-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1452 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4069 of 2005 ====================================================== Sonelal Raut, son of Late Rajinandan Raut, resident of village - Haranahiya, P.S. Sheohar, District - Sheohar. .... .... Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Collector, Sheohar, District - Sheohar

3. The Superintendent of Police, Sheohar, District - Sheohar.

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sheohar, District - Sheohar

5. The District Welfare Officer, Sheohar, District - Sheohar

6. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sheohar, District - Sheohar

7. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sheohar, District - Sheohar

8. The Officer-in-Charge of Sheohar Police Station, District - Sheohar.

9. The Circle Officer, Sheohar, District - Sheohar .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Uday Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gp31- Smt. Binita Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI And HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 3.

03-05-2017 This appeal is required to be dismissed in limine, because the learned Single Judge, vide order dated 25.04.2005, was correct in holding that the Chowkidars were not government employee prior to the year 1990. Since the death of father of the appellant happened in the year 1988, there is no provision for compassionate appointment for such persons.

Patna High Court LPA No.1452 of 2014 (3) dt.03-05-2017 Even otherwise, since the death of the bread earner happened in the year 1988 and almost 18 years have gone past, the very object and purpose behind compassionate appointment, if at all it was available, has been lost over a period of time. It is frivolous appeal. Thus, we find no merit in this appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Rajeev/- U