Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57920/2018bail granted

Pappu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-28Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57920 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2018 Thana -BARIYARPUR District- MUNGER ======================================================

1. Pappu Sah Son of Late Jagdish Sah Resident of Village - Nandlalpur, Police Station - Muffasil, District - Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Vinod Shankar Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 28.07.2018 in connection with Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 94 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 90 liters liquor from the possession of the petitioner.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has no criminal antecedents. Further submission is that charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is in custody since 28.07.2018.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57920 of 2018 (2) dt.28-09-2018 2/2 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge IInd cum Special Judge (Excise Act), Munger, in connection with Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 94 of 2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T