← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17206/2014withdrawn

Arjun Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-08Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17206 of 2014 ====================================================== Arjun Prasad son of Late Babuchand Gope Resident of Mohalla - Flat no. 304, Gayetri Apartment, Anand Bihar Colony, Ambedkarpath, P.S. Rupaspur, Town and District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

3. District Magistrate, Patna.

4. The Town Commissioner, Patna Nagar Nigam, Patna.

5. The Circle Officer, Danapur, Patna.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. Utsav Kumar, A.C. to GA-11 For the Respondent PMC :

Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 08-09-2015 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Utsav Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing for the State. We have heard also Mr. Prasoon Sinha, learned Counsel, appearing for the respondent Patna Municipal Corposation.

After some arguments, Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17206 of 2014 (2) dt.08-09-2015 2/2 No objection has been raised the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U