Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36327/2016bail granted

Pappu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-23Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36327 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -134 Year- 2007 Thana -PANDARAK District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Pappu Mahto son of Wakil Mahto, Resident of Village- Chakki Gopalpur, P.S. Bachhwara, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajeev Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2016 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is named in the first information report and does have some criminal antecedent but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that after institution of the present case, the statement of victim was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. on 20.09.2007 but in the aforesaid statement, the victim does not disclose the name of the petitioner. It is further submitted that co-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36327 of 2016 (2) dt.23-08-2016 2/2 accused, Sato Rai and several others have already been granted privilege of bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Barh, Patna in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1171 A of 2011 arising out of Pandarak P.S. Case No. 134 of 2007, subject to condition that he shall attend the trial court on each and every date in person for the period of nine months or till conclusion of his trial whichever is earlier and if he fails to do so on three consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T