Patna High CourtCWJC/8630/1998dfd for non appearance

Union Of North Vihar Industria v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-07-16Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8630 of 1998 ======================================================

1. Union of North Vihar Industrial & Establishment Workers, through its General Secretary, Satya Narayan Thakur, Office at Chandra Shekhar Bhawan, Mithanpura, Muzaffarpur-842002.

2. Virendra Prasad son of Shri Kailash Prasad, resident of village Noora Bazar,P.S. Masaurhi, District Patna.

3. Vijay Kumar son of late Rameshwar Prasad, resident of town, P.S. and District Lakhisarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar , through Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Labour, Employment & Training Department, Vikash Bhawan, Patna-15.

2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Labour, Employment & Training Department, Vikash Bhawan, Patna-15.

3. The Labour Commissioner, Labour, Employment & Training Department, Vikash Bhawan, Patna-15.

4. The Under Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Labour, Employment & Training Department.

5. M/S Prabhat Zarda Factory (India) Ltd. New Area, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur through its Manager.

6. M/S Allied Manufacturing Works, New Area, Sikandrapur, Muzaffarpur through its Partner cum Occupier.

7. Pannalal, son of Chatrubhuj Ram, Manager, Prabhat Zarda Factory, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur.

8. Dwarika Prasad Krishn Production Manager, Prabhat Zarda Factory, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur.

9. Shreedhar Prasad Director, Prabhat Zarda Factory, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur.

10. Om Prakash, Partner cum Occupier, M/S Allied Manufacturing Works, New Area, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None.

For the Respondent/s : None.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition. None appears on behalf of the respondents either, though the names of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are printed in the daily cause list.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8630 of 1998 (10) dt.16-07-2015 2/2 Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U