Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33161/2016bail granted

Shivpujan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-24Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33161 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -677 Year- 2013 Thana -TURKAULIYA District- EASTCHAMPARAN MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Shivpujan Rai, Son of Dharamdeo Rai Resident of village- Pipra, P.S.- Darpa, District- East Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. R.P.Nat 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 24-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 13.07.2015 in connection with Turkaulia (Banjaria) P.S. Case No. 677 of 2013 for the alleged offences under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on the confessional statement of Shankar Ram who has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 32722 of 2015. The mobile number from which the extortion call was made has not been found to belong to the petitioner.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 9th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari (East Champaran) in connection with Turkaulia (Banjaria) P.S. Case No. 677 of 2013 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33161 of 2016 (2) dt.24-08-2016 the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T