Parshuram Das @ Pashuram Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21919 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2021 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Parshuram Das @ Pashuram Das Son of Late Yaduvanshi Singh Village -Baraini (Diha) PS -Belaganj Distt -Gaya Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Vishwanath Prasad, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-04-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 411 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 21 of the MM (DR) Act 1957, BM (CPIMTS) Rules 2019, Bihar Mineral (Equality illegal Mining Transport and Prevention of storage Amendment Rules 2021) and under Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act 1986.
3. As per prosecution case, based on a tip off, several individuals were identified to be involved in illegal mining and storage of sand causing huge revenue loss to the Government.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21919 of 2025(2) dt.28-04-2025 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. As per F.I.R., illegally mined sand was found stored in a land measuring 90 decimal of land and petitioner is owner of a land measuring 15 decimal, which is adjacent to the alleged land measuring 90 decimal and as a matter of fact, no illegal sand was stored on the land of this petitioner and he has been made an accused in this case merely on suspicion. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 220 of 2021, subject to condition as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21919 of 2025(2) dt.28-04-2025 3/3 laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T