← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17388/2014dismissed

Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2022-12-05Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17388 of 2014 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar S/o Late Kusheshwar Paswan Resident of Village and Post Office Janipur, Police Station Nanpur, District Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Paatna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

3.

The Deputy Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Incharge Chief Town Planner, Urban, Regional Planning Organization, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Block Development Officer, Nanpur, District Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Nath Dubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, G.P. 16 :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to GP 16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-12-2022 Though the present writ petition has been filed for appointing the petitioner on compassionate ground in lieu of death of his father on 14.01.2009, who was working as draftman in the Office of the Incharge Chief Town Planner, Urban, Regional Planning Organization, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna i.e. the respondent no. 4, however, the respondents have filed a counter affidavit, wherein it has been stated that after considering the objections of the petitioner and following the due process and formalities, as prescribed under the law, the Compassionate

Patna High Court CWJC No.17388 of 2014(3) dt.05-12-2022 2/2 Appointment Committee has finally taken a decision to appoint the younger brother of the petitioner namely Ajay Kumar, whereafter a letter dated 20.11.2014 has also been issued to him but the said decision has not been challenged by the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition, hence, the same stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U