Sahid Ali @ Shahid Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20210 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2022 Thana- GORIAKOTHI District- Siwan ====================================================== SAHID ALI @ SHAHID ANSARI, S/o Gafur Mian @ Gafur Ansari Resident of Village- Bazidpur, Police Station- Goreakothi, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

As per FIR, one country made katta and four live cartridges were recovered from the house of co-accused Rahul Kumar, who disclosed that the recovered country made katta was given to him by Shrikant Singh and four live cartridges were given to him by Sahid Ali (petitioner).

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has been submitted that name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case on the confessional statement made by the co-accused and except said confessional statement, there is no any other incriminating material against the petitioner. Petitioner has no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20210 of 2022(2) dt.11-07-2022 2/2 criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 24.01.2022. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Goreyakothi P.S. Case No. 10 of 2022 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T