← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59447/2018bail granted

Arun Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-28Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59447 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -527 Year- 2013 Thana -ARARIA District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Arun Ram, Son of Bechan Ram, Resident of Village- Sekhpura, Mahalgaon, P.S.- Mahalgaon, Dist.- Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 05.06.2018 in connection with Araria P.S. Case No.527 of 2013, arising out of G.R. Case No.2831 of 2013, registered for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR, his name has surfaced on the basis of the confessional statement made before the police by one Raj Kamal Biswas and thereafter, the petitioner was made to give his self-confessional statement before the police. It is further submitted that such confessional statements made before the police have no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59447 of 2018 (2) dt.28-09-2018 2/3 evidentiary value and, therefore, the petitioner may be extended the privilege of bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Araria P.S. Case No.527 of 2013, arising out of G.R. Case No.2831 of 2013. However, noting the fact that the petitioner has got criminal antecedents, the bail order shall be subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be the father of the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59447 of 2018 (2) dt.28-09-2018 3/3 investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T