Bindu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12537 of 2015 ====================================================== Bindu Kumari wife of Bachcha Kumar, Resident of Village Bijulpur Bankati, Ward No. 6, Police Station Turkaulia, District East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.The Director, Integrated child Development Services, Bihar, Patna. 3.The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4.The District Magistrate, East Champaran,(Motihari). 5.The District Programme officer, Integrated Child Development Services, District East Champaran, (Motihari).
6.The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, East Champaran, Motihari.
7. The Child Development Project Officer, Turkaulia, East Champaran, Motihari.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad- GP18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT 17-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Having regard to the fact that the impugned order cancelling the selection and appointment of the petitioner on the post of Anganbadi Sevika, has been passed by the District Programme Officer, East Champaran, Motihari that such order is appealable in terms of the Anganbadi Sevika guidelines, this writ application prima facie appears to be ill advised and misconceived.
Patna High Court CWJC No.12537 of 2015 (2) dt.17-08-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner in such circumstances seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to enable the petitioner to file an appeal against the aforementioned order dated 27.06.2015.
This Court keeping in view that this writ application was filed on 13.08.2015, would give liberty to the petitioner to file her such appeal before the appellate authority within a period of 15 days from today and if it is done by the petitioner, the appellate authority, shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in the memo of appeal, without non suiting the petitioner on the ground of delay/limitation, if any. That being so, this application is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty.
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Ranjan/- U