← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./45/2022withdrawn

B.N. Mandal University v. Dhirendra Thakur

2025-04-17Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.45 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2102 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

B.N. Mandal University Laloo Nagar, Madhepura through its Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura.

2.

The Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. 3.

The Finance Officer, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Dhirendra Thakur son of Devadatt Thakur, resident of Village- Navtolia, Ward no.- 02, P.O.- Madhepura, P.S.- Madhepura, District- Madhepura, Pin852113. 2.

Bouku Mallik @ Vauku Mallik son of Late Phani Malik, resident of VillageBharahi, Ward No.- 04, P.O.- Bharahi, P.S. Madhepura, District- Madhepura, PIN- 852113.

3.

The State of Bihar Bihar 4.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Director, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna. 7.

The Principal, T.P. College, Madhepura.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Apurva Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Mr. Naman Nayak, AC to AAG-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 17-04-2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects.

2. The present appeal has been preferred for the grant of following relief:

"For review the order dated 10.03.2022 passed

Patna High Court C. REV. No.45 of 2022(5) dt.17-04-2025 2/2 in C.W.J.C. No. 2102 OF 2022 by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma (as his lordship then was) whereby and whereunder the Hon'ble Court was pleased to direct the State and University to take step for consideration of the case of petitioners for regularization within eight weeks henceforth."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition.

4. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U