Rajesh Mistri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17970 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2010 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Rajesh Mistri, Son of late Chandradeo Mistri, Resident of Village - Kako Barhi Tola, P.S.- Kako, Distt.- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satish Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-05-2019 Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.238 of 2016-15/2018 (Arising out of Kako P.S. Case No.14 of 2010) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 504 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

This case is of misuse of privilege of bail and bail bonds of the petitioner was cancelled vide order 05.05.2016 and later on, he was arrested on 06.02.2019.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact, there are two accused persons in this case and the case of one accused is separate and refer to the Juvenile Justice Board and in that confusion petitioner did not appear before the court and he is ready to abide by the conditions imposed upon him and he is in custody for about

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17970 of 2019(2) dt.20-05-2019 2/2 three months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions JudgeV, Jehanabad, in connection with Sessions Trial No.238 of 2016-15/2018 (Arising out of Kako P.S. Case No.14 of 2010), subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned with the condition that he has to appear before the court as and when required, otherwise his bail bonds shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T