Munarik @ Mundrika Chaudhary @ Titahri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32536 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -182 Year- 2015 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ====================================================== Munarik @ Mundrika Chaudhary @ Titahri Son of - Prasad Choudhary Resident of Village- Kewaliya, P.S.- Dobhi, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 182 of 2015 registered for offence under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation, miscreants have snatched Rs. 1,200/- and mobile set of the informant and also snatched Rs. 250 and mobile set from the pocket of his brother-in-law. They also looted the other passengers of the vehicle passing through that road.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of petitioner has surfaced on the confessional statement of one Munarik Yadav, who has already been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 27322 of 2016. He further submits, nothing has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32536 of 2016 (2) dt.19-08-2016 2/2 been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, nor the petitioner has been put on T.I.P.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, Munarik @ Mundrika Chaudhary @ Titahri, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shearghati (Gaya) in connection with Sherghati (Dhobi) P.S. Case No. 182 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T