← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4842/2024dismissed

Kumari Mamta v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-04Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4842 of 2024 ====================================================== Kumari Mamta Wife of Shambhu Kumar Resident of Village-Khatuaha, Ward No.13, P.O. Khairi,Gram Panchayat-Dinmanpur South, P.S Khanpur, District Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Secretary Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

3.

The District Programme Officer, I.C.D.S. Cell, Samastipur. 4.

The Child Developm,ent Project Officer, Khanpur, Samastipur. 5.

The Lady Supervisor, Center No. 187, Khanpur, District-Samastipur. 6.

Mala Kumari Wife of Sri Sanjay Kumar Resident of Village- Chakwakhar, Ward No.7, Gram Panchayat-Jahangirpur, Block and P.S.-Khanpur, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Anand, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.D.Yadav, AAG-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That the present writ application is being filed in the nature of certiorari for challenging the order dated 17.2.2024 passed by the District Programme Officer, I.C.D.S. Samastipur in Case No.

115, 138/2018 whereby and whereunder the service of the petitioner from the Post of Aaganwari Sewika was terminated and the C.D.P.O was directed to pass an order and issued appointment letter in

Patna High Court CWJC No.4842 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2 favour of Respondent No.6 in terms of order dated 11.3.2023 contained in Memo No. 921 issued under the signature of District Magistrate, Samastipur in Aanganwari Appeal Case No.

584/2019 and 548/2019 respectively."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U