Seema Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3211 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -116 Year- 2016 Thana -KHUSRUPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Seema Devi Wife of Yogendra Prasad resident of village - Safipur, P.S. Khushrupur, District - Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 363(A) and 366 of the Indian Penal Code.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation against the petitioner is that she had taken the victim girl with her but thereafter, she did not return. But the statement made in the case diary does not corroborate the same fact and as such, nothing has been found against the petitioner. Heard learned A.P.P. also. He has submitted that there is suspicion against the petitioner.
Having heard both sides, in view of the allegation, let above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within a
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3211 of 2017 (3) dt.02-03-2017 2/2 period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class cum Addl. Munsif-IV, Patna City, in connection with Khushrupur P.S. Case no. 116 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also subject to the conditions that (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make herself available before the police as and when required.
(3) if after submission of chargesheet any incriminating material comes against the petitioner, except what has been stated above, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner.
Accordingly, this application stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T