Bhushan Singh @ Bhushan @ Ashok Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20356 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2020 Thana- DAWATH District- Rohtas ====================================================== Bhushan Singh @ Bhushan @ Ashok Kumar Singh Son Of Awadesh Singh Resident Of Village - Bodarhi Mathiya, P.S.- Dawath, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20356 of 2022(2) dt.23-08-2022 2/2 nature. He submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.03.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20176 of 2021. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that injured persons got 2-3 distinct injuries on the vital parts of the body which doctor opined were caused by gun shot firing.

Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Dawath P.S. Case No. 101 of 2020.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T