Rupam Devi @ Rupam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18762 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-408 Year-2024 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== Rupam Devi @ Rupam Kumari W/o Sri Ranjan Kumar Yadav @ Ranjan Yadav Resident of Pirnagra, P.S- Beldaur, Distt. - Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction/s in paragraph No.1 of the bail application in the course of the day. 3.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 408 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 & 35 of the Arms Act. 4.

Prosecution case in short is that there is recovery of one country made pistol and twelve cartridges from the house of the petitioner.

5.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 02-12-2024. Petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18762 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/3 bears no criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

6.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that petitioner has no concern with the recovered arms. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that recovery is made from the house of co-accused, namely, Ranjan Kumar Yadav and petitioner is her wife. Nothing has been recovered from the consious or physical possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is a female. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023.

7.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 8.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, petitioner being female and manner of petitioner's implication, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

9.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 408 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18762 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T