Arjun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20196 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2021 Thana- SALAIYA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== ARJUN YADAV SON OF SOMAR YADAV R/O VILLAGE- SONARCHAK (SONARI BIGHA), P.S.- SALAIYA, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amended Act, 2018. Allegation is recovery of 70 litres of Mahua wine from the bush and it is said to be that the same was kept by petitioner and other co-accused.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he in innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Nothing was recovered from the possession of petitioner nor he was apprehended on the spot. Petitioner is in custody since 11.02.2022.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20196 of 2022(2) dt.12-07-2022 2/2 of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Spl. Judge Excise 1st, Aurangabad (Bihar), in connection with Salaiya P.S. Case No. 62 of 2021, subject to conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/veenaU