← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6782/2020disposed

Ranjit Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-20Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6782 of 2020 ====================================================== Ranjit Prasad Yadav Son of Late Kuldip Mahto, Resident of Village- Kanchan Garh, Post Office Bank, Police Station Mufassil, District- Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna- 800 2.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna- 800 001 3.

The District Education Officer, Munger.

4.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Munger. 5.

The Headmistress, Middle School, Machhidih, Areraj, Munger ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Shilpa Singh, (GA12) Ms. Abhanjalli, AC to GA 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-01-2025 Heard Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. Abhanjalli, learned AC to GA 12 appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition, with a liberty to avail remedy before the District Teacher Appellate Authority.

3. Considering the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner is required to file Limitation Petition for condonation of delay in filing of the said

Patna High Court CWJC No.6782 of 2020(5) dt.20-01-2025 2/2 appeal. The District Appellate Authority must consider to condone any delay in filing of the appeal, considering the fact that the entire world was affected by the Covid-19 pandemic and the writ petition was filed in the year 2020 during which period several advisories were issued by the Central Government and the State Government, as well as, by this Court.

4. After condoning the delay, the District Appellate Authority is directed to adjudicate the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner expeditiously, in accordance with law.

5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J.) Ashishsingh/- U