Md. Qamrruddin @ Hero Mian v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2890 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -442 Year- 2016 Thana -GAYA MUFFSIL District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Md. Qamrruddin @ Hero Mian, Son of late Rajan Mian, resident of Village- Bhusanda, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Muffasil P. S. Case No. 442 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147,148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 324, 307, 332,333, 337, 338, 353, 427, 435, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, 500 to 600 miscreants started making slogans against police and they started pelting stones, resulting the informant was seriously injured. Inspite of direction, given by S.D.P.O., B.D.O., and C.O., Manpur, the miscreants were making slogans and pelting stones, causing injuries to several constables and thereafter, 25 miscreants were arrested and others succeeded in fleeing away, photography and Videography of the occurrence

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2890 of 2017 (2) dt.14-02-2017 2/2 were done. Earlier, the petitioner and others co-accused have assaulted a youth but local people pacified the matter and for that, this occurrence has been caused.

Submission is of false implication and that the name of the petitioner has come in last para of page-3 of the F.I.R. that the petitioner and others have assaulted a youth. The petitioner has got no connection with attacking on police party and any other and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances state above, the petitioner above named, in case of his surrender or arrest within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, shall be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Muffasil P. S. Case No. 442 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Sudha/- U T