Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60391/2018bail granted

Lalan Choudhary @ Lalan Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60391 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -263 Year- 2018 Thana -MURLIGANJ District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Lalan Choudhary @ Lalan Kumar Chaudhary S/o Chandeshwari Chaudhary, R/o Vill.- Rahta, Ward No. 7, P.S.- Kumarkhand, DistrictMadhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 263 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 15 litres of country made liquor It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 31.07.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60391 of 2018 (2) dt.06-10-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge II, Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhepura, in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 263 of 2018, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T