Saudagar Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1007 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Saudagar Rai Son of Ram Rai Resident of Village- Reganiya, P.S.- Jitna, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, East Champaran

3. The District Superintendent of Police Motihari, East Champaran

4. The Sub divisional officer (S.D.O.) Sikrahana at Dhaka Motihari, East Champaran

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sikrahana at Motihari, East Champaran.

6. The Circle Officer, Ghorasahan, Motihari, East Champaran.

7. The Officer-in-charge, Ghorasahan Police Station, Motihari, East Champaran.

8. Teji Lal Mahato Son of Mewalal Mahato Resident of Village- Bishunpur, Athmohan, P.S.- Jharokhar, District- East Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Satyendra Rai, A.C. to SC-30 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this application filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has raised several disputed questions of fact relating to right, title and possession, which cannot be adjudicated in a writ proceeding. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain this application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- U T