Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24195/2023allowed

Rajmani Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-19Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24195 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2022 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

RAJMANI DEVI Wife of Late Arjun Manjhi @ Barati Manjhi R/V- Raghu Rampur, P.S- Gaurichak , Dist- Patna 2.

Poonam Kumari @ Poonam Devi Wife of Late Arjun Manjhi R/V- Raghu Rampur, P.S- Gaurichak , Dist- Patna ... ... petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the petitioners/s :

Mr.Sanju Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 19-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of killing the uncle of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. There is no consistent evidence and no eye-witness of the alleged occurrence to show that the petitioners have involved in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24195 of 2023(3) dt.19-09-2023 2/2 present case. On the basis of suspicion and self confession of the petitioners implicated in the present case. From the perusal of the Postmortem report the doctor has not opined the cause of death. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. They are languishing in judicial custody since 24.05.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 225 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U