Vicky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20801 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-489 Year-2021 Thana- PATNA CITY CHOWK District- Patna ====================================================== VICKY KUMAR Son of Vinod Prasad @ Binod Prasad Resident of VillageGopalganj Road, Sonar Tola (Suraj Tola), Manpur, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shyamal Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.12.2021 and has antecedent of one case.

The informant alleges that his brother was going for company's work with money of Vikash Jain to deposit in the Bank when he was intercepted by 2-3 miscreants who shot him and snatched Rs. 5,00,000/-, further one of the miscreants was caught and others escaped and his brother was taken to hospital

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20801 of 2022(4) dt.06-01-2023 2/2 for treatment.

Learned counsel submits that petitioner was apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, it is next submitted that his name transpired in the confessional statement of the apprehended accuse.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the offence is serious and it is not a case of snatching money only but the victim was shot, it is next submitted that from paragraph 48 of the Case Diary, it would manifest that the petitioner was identified in the C.C.T.V. footage also.

Considering the submission made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on Regular bail.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T