Jagarnath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.61415 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2018 Thana -DARBHANGA RAIL P.S. DistrictSAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Jagarnath Yadav, S/o Raj Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village- Ekmighat Chandi, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Das For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Petitioner prays for bail in connection with Darbhanga Rail P.S.Case No. 131 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 328 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation as per FIR is that he supplied tea to the informant and his wife in train and took away their belongings. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is not named in the FIR and nothing has been recovered from his possession and he is in custody since 27.6.2018. Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that offence is very serious and he is accused in one more case of similar type.
Having heard both sides and in the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61415 of 2018 (2) dt.11-10-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
However, once charge has been framed and trial is commenced, learned trial court shall release the petitioner on bail to its own satisfaction on the condition that he has to co-operate in disposal of trial.
With the above observation, this application is disposed of.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T