← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11579/2015disposed

Satya Prakash v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-05-10Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11579 of 2015 ====================================================== Satya Prakash son of Sri Shivjee Prakash, resident of Mohalla- Bihiyan road Piro, Town, Post Office, Police Station and Block- Piro, District- Bhojpur at Ara. at Present working on the post of Block Teacher Madhya Vidiyalaya Hasan Bazar, Post Hasan Bazar, District- Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate Bhojpur at Ara.

5.

The District Education Officer Bhojpur at Ara. 6.

The Program Officer Establishment, Education Department, Bhojpur at Ara. 7.

The Block Education Officer Piro, District- Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Smt. Binita Singh- Gp31 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-05-2019 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by a judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court dated 03.04.2017 passed in Civil Appeal no. 4776-4777 of 2017 (Mukesh & Another v. State of Bihar and Others).

Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that the Program Officer (Establishment), Education Department, Bhojpur at Ara shall consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Apex

Patna High Court CWJC No.11579 of 2015(2) dt.10-05-2019 2/2 Court.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent no. 6 within a period of four weeks from today and the respondent no. 6 shall dispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks thereafter and in case, the case of the petitioner is found similar to that of the respondents of the aforesaid judgment dated 03.04.2017, similar relief would be granted to the petitioner herein within a period of six weeks therefrom. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U