Patna High CourtCWJC/15/2014dismissed

Piyush Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-02Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Piyush Kumar Yadav Son Of Sri Raghu Nath Rai Resident Of Village - Chiraiya, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, Distt. Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department

3. The Director, Public Education, Government Of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate Cum-District Officer, Patna

5. The District Education Officer, Patna

6. The District Programme Officer (Training Rmsa And Literacy), Patna

7. The Chief Programme Co-Ordinator, District Public Education Samiti, Patna

8. The Chairman, District Board, Patna

9. The Chairman, District Appointment Committee Of District Lok Shiksha Samiti, Patna

10. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Patna

11. The District Jan Shiksha Padadhikari, Patna

12. The Block Education Officer, Bakhtiyarpur, District - Patna

13. The Block Programme Coordinator Cum-Secretary Of The Block Education Samiti, Bakhtiyarpur, District - Patna

14. The Mukhiya, Chiraiya Panchayat, Bakhtiyarpur Block, Distt. Patna

15. The Head Master, Ucch Vidyalaya, Harnhia, Bakhtiyarpur, District - Patna

16. Sujeet Kumar Son Of Ram Prit Rai Resident Of Village - Chiraiya, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, Distt. Patna

17. Guria Devi Wife Of Sri Subodh Sao Alias Bodhi Sao Resident Of Village - Chiraya, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, District - Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. ALOK KUMAR SINHA, Sr. Advocate For the Zila Parishad:

Mr. Nikesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. RAJU GIRI =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-02-2015 *************** 02.02.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The Court is not inclined to interfere with the decision, which has already lost its effect on 31st of March, 2014.

Even otherwise, since the post in question is

Patna High Court CWJC No.15 of 2014 dt.02-02-2015 2/2 not a civil post or a permanent post under the State, but a contractual engagement, which was done by the authorities for a limited purpose and object, the Court is not willing to give any direction in favour of the petitioner. Writ application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/- U