Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20934 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-348 Year-2022 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== ROHIT KUMAR @ ROHIT RAJ SON OF MADAN RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - GARKHA, P.S. - GARKHA, DISTT. - SARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

For the informant :

Mr. Braj Nandan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 447, 504, 324, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and is alleged to have assaulted the uncle of the informant by knife on his back causing injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the present case has been instituted by way of counterblast Garkha P.S. Case No. 347 of 2022. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that there is a direct allegation against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20934 of 2023(2) dt.26-06-2023 2/2 this petitioner of causing stab wound on the back of the uncle of the informant.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the opinion with regard to the injuries is still reserved.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 348 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

However, the learned Trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the Injury Report and in the event, if it is found that the injuries caused is grievous then the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T