Amit Kumar @ Subham Kumar @ Amit Yadav @ Subham Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26273 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2024 Thana- Ghogha District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Amit Kumar @ Subham Kumar @ Amit Yadav @ Subham Yadav Son of Bihari Yadav Resident of Village- Pakkisarai, P.S.- Ghogha, DistrictBhagalpur 2.

Gautam Yadav Son of Sadanand Yadav Resident of Village- Pakkisarai, P.S.- Ghogha, District- Bhagalpur 3.

Bihari Yadav Son of Late Ramblish Yadav Resident of Village- Pakkisarai, P.S.- Ghogha, District- Bhagalpur 4.

Diwakar Yadav Son of Late Ramblish Yadav Resident of Village- Pakkisarai, P.S.- Ghogha, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Diwakar Upadhyaya, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(1)(2), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 190, 352, 351(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, on 25.12.2024, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners entered into the house of the informant and tried to outrage the modesty of his mother. Upon protest, the accused persons assaulted informant and his family members by means of iron

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26273 of 2026(3) dt.24-06-2026 2/2 rod as result of which they sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation of any overt act against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- II, Bhagalpur in connection with Ghogha P. S. Case No. 178 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/Sanjay U T