Prashant Kumar v. The Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5661 of 2022 ====================================================== Prashant Kumar Son of Late Chandeshwar Singh Resident of Bharti Bhawan, Thana Road Mahrajganj, P.S.-Mahrajganj, District-Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi.
2.
The Secretary Department of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi. 3.
The Punjab National Bank through its Chief General Officer,7, Bhikhaiji Cama Place, New Delhi-110607.
4.
The Zipnal Manager, Punjab National Bank, Zonal Office, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.
5.
The Senior Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Mahrajganj Branch, District-Siwan.
6.
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited through its Chief General Manager, Registered Office Oriental House P.B. No. 7037, A25/27, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi-110002.
7.
The Senior Divisional Manager, D.O.-3 (Code No. 272200), Oriental Insurance Company Limited, 4E/40, Ajad Bhawan, Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi 55 8.
The Regional Manager Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Kadam Kuan, Patna.
9.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home (Police), Government of Bihar, Patna.
10.
The Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, Bailey Road, Patna. 11.
The In-charge Director, Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Pallav, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar, GP-4 Mr. Abhay Shankar Jha, Advocate Mr. Ashok Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
2/4 Date : 19-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
3/4 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not to be in favour with the submissions made across the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petitioner shall be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum, including the Ombudsman and/or take recourse to such other alternative remedies, equally efficacious in law.
Permission granted.
We are sure that as and when any such
4/4 proceedings are initiated, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
Needless to add, the authorities/adjudicative body shall pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open.
The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (Satyavrat Verma, J) Amrendra/PKP AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 20.05.2022 Transmission Date