Mannu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18474 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27830 Year-2014 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.
MANNU KUMAR Son of Madan Gopal Prasad Resident of VillageChistipur, P.S.- Chandi, District- Nalanda, at present working as Revenue Karmchari Anchal Asthawan, P.S.- Asthawan, District- Nalanda. 2.
Madan Gopal Prasad Son of Late Harihar Prasad Resident of VillageChistipur, P.S.- Chandi, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad Ii For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 12-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned APP. Both the parties are close relatives. The allegation is at the end of OP No.2/complainant regarding misappropriation of Rs. 60,000/-.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioner no.2 who is the maternal uncle of the OP No.2 is ready to deposit the amount though, this case has been filed purposely, intentionally under coercive methodology as, the negotiation to purchase the land having at the instance of petitioner no.2 failed on one pretext or the other and for that, Annexure-3 has been filed, in order to save their prestige.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18474 of 2019(4) dt.12-06-2019 2/2 Considering the undertaking, on deposit of Rs. 60,000/-, petitioners, namely, 1. Mannu Kumar and, 2. Madan Gopal Prasad, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of order, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two securities of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Judge-XIV-cumAdditional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 27830(C) of 2014, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC. Withdrawal of aforesaid amount will be subject to result of the trial. (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) perwez U T