Ramesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20704 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2021 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

RAMESH MAHTO Son of Sukhari Mahto Resident of Village - Kalwari Majhariya, P.S. - Adapur, District - East Champaran. 2.

Kailash Mahto Son of Sukhari Mahto Resident of Village - Kalwari Majhariya, P.S. - Adapur, District - East Champaran. 3.

Ingrashan Mahto Son of Sukhari Mahto Resident of Village - Kalwari Majhariya, P.S. - Adapur, District - East Champaran. 4.

Sukhari Mahto Son of Dhandhari Mahto @ Dhanusdhari Mahto Resident of Village - Kalwari Majhariya, P.S. - Adapur, District - East Champaran. 5.

Tetari Devi Wife of Sukhari Mahto Resident of Village - Kalwari Majhariya, P.S. - Adapur, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307/379 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution's case in short is that all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant and others causing injuries to four persons. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20704 of 2022(2) dt.01-09-2022 2/2 implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation of abuse and assault against all the accused persons and no specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioners. Injury caused by the petitioners were found to be simple in nature. There is a case and counter case. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Raxaul at Motihari, subject to the conditions laid down under sections 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T