Ramu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20824 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2019 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Ramu Paswan Son of Kapil Paswan Resident of village - Morsand, P.S.- Runisaidpur, District - Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 31-08-2022 Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 268 of 2019 lodged under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C.

As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner and her family is to kill the deceased who is the Damad (Son-in-law) of the petitioner's family. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is Father-in-law of the deceased. He submits that in this case, the entire family of the petitioner including the wife

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20824 of 2022(4) dt.31-08-2022 2/2 were made accused by the brother of the deceased (informant). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is unbelievable that the family of Sasural shall kill their Damad. He further submits that the petitioner is man of clean antecedent. He is in custody since 17.11.2011, charge sheet has already been filed in this case but he is not aware that whether charge has been framed or not.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that allegation of murder of the deceased was made upon the Father-in-law, Mother-in-law, Brother-in-law and wife of deceased.

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present but he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The court below shall release him on bail putting condition of his own satisfaction. With this observation, the bail petition is rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J) sadique/- U T