Naresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32955 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -70 Year- 2014 Thana -CHANDRADEEP District- JAMUI ====================================================== Naresh Yadav Son of Late Bodhal Yadav, resident of Village- Bhaluana, P.S.- Chandradeep, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Prasad, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2016 in connection with Chandradeep P.S. Case No. 70 of 2014 for the offences alleged under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusations are general and omnibus against all nine accused persons without attributing any specific overt act against the petitioner. Similarly situated other co-accused have been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 44232 of 2015 and analogous cases.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32955 of 2016 (2) dt.20-08-2016 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sanjay Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jamui in connection with Chandradeep P.S. Case No. 70 of 2014 with the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T