Ravi Blade @ Khiladi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20307 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2016 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== RAVI BLADE @ KHILADI SON OF SRI NAND KISHORE TIWARI R/O VILLAGE- KARARI, P.S.- BADDI (SHIVSAGAR), DISTRICT- ROHTAS ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation, accused persons firstly dashed against the motorcycle of the informant and thereafter assaulted him with his helmet and looted a sum of Rs 2000/-, mobile phone, Adhar card, voter card etc from the possession of the informant. The main submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner are that in the present case, petitioner's involvement is based on the statement of co-accused Prakash Kumar Pandey who has been considered for regular bail by a coordinate bench of this court vide order passed in Cr. Misc. no. 16901 of 2017 and two other

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20307 of 2022(2) dt.19-07-2022 2/2 accused persons whose names also surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused have been considered for bail by a coordinate bench of this court vide order passed in Cr. Misc. no. 19518 of 2017. Further submission is that there are seven criminal antecedent of the petitioner and among the said cases, he has been granted bail in six cases and one case is pending for consideration. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

Having considered the above submissions, and mainly the fact that in respect of involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime the prosecution is mainly relying upon statement of co-accused Prakash Kumar Pandey given before the police as appears from the order of the court below and the said co-accused has been considered for bail vide order passed in the aforesaid miscellaneous case, hence, petitioner deserves the privilege of bail. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate V, Sasaram, Rohtas in Nokha P.S Case No. 154 of 2016.

(Shailendra Singh, J) s.hassan/- U T