← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6364/2024disposed

Deepanshu Enterprises v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-21Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6364 of 2024 ====================================================== Deepanshu Enterprises through its Proprietor, Madan Kumar Singh, age- 48, S/o Jamadar Singh, Teacher Colony, Uttari Dahiyawan, Chapra, Saran, Bihar841301. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal-cum-Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Panta. 2.

The Additional Chief Executive Officer-Cum-Secretary, Bihar Rural Road Development Authority, Patna.

3.

The Chief Engineer Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate Saran at Chapra.

5.

The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle, Chapra.

6.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Marhaura, Saran.

7.

The Assistant Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Sub- Division, Panapur, Saran.

8.

The Junior Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Sub-Division, Panapur, Saran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Additional Advocate General (4).

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has stated that though the authorities have paid the entire amount pertaining to the work done by the petitioner. The authorities have not paid the maintenance amount due towards the maintenance. Learned counsel has prayed this Hon'ble Court to permit him to file a suitable representation before the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6364 of 2024(6) dt.21-03-2025 2/2 authority concerned for payment of the maintenance amount.

2. Having regard to the above made submission, the present writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make a suitable representation within a period of two weeks from today in so far as the maintenance work is concerned. On such representation being given, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and necessary orders passed. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. In case, the claim of the petitioner is found to be true, the authority shall take necessary steps for making the payments. In case, the authorities are in the considered view that the amount paid includes the maintenance work, they shall pass a reasoned orders giving the reasons of such rejection.

3. With the above observation, the present Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(A. Abhishek Reddy, J) shakir/- U