Rahul Kumar Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11994 of 2015 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Ranjan Son of Suresh Chandra Sharma, R/O Sadhupur Jeevan, Garaul, P.S.- Satpura, District- Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur 5.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Muzaffarpur 6.

The District General, Vigilence Cell, Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. S.A. Alam with Ms. Anjum Perveen, Advocates For the State :

Mr. Manoj Ambastha, SC-26.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "a). To direct the respondent to immediately restrain themself from harassing the teacher whose certificates are genuine, in the name of Vigilance inquiry through out the State of Bihar. b). To direct the respondent specially respondent no.6 to keep the vigilance inquiry within the limit of verification genuineness of Certificates of the teachers who have been appointed from 2006 onwards till date and not to harass and blackmail the teachers on other ground which is strictly prohibited by the Hon'ble Court in its order dtd. 10-5-2015

Patna High Court CWJC No.11994 of 2015(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15459 of 2014 (Ranjeet Pandit Vs. The state of Bihar & ors).

c) To grant any other relief- reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled under the facts and circumstances of the instant case."

The petitioner's writ application is based on nothing more than an apprehension. There is no specific instance of alleged harassment.

It is trite law that till any tangible threat or apprehension is manifest and existing there is no occasion for this Court to exercise writ jurisdiction.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U