Munna @ Md. Irshad Mansuri @ Md. Irshad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23672 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2020 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== MUNNA @ MD. IRSHAD MANSURI @ MD. IRSHAD Son of Late Alamgeer R/V- Rajbag Pupri, P.S- Purpri P.O- Janakpur Road, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Niraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 385, 504, 379, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, informant is a mason and petitioner demanded extortion money from his brother and then taken away money box (galla) with him. When informant requested him to return his money box, petitioner hold him by his collar and opened fire upon him, which hit to Parmanand Kumar in his right hand wrist. It is further alleged that he and other accused person hit him with butt of the pistol on his head and inflicted knife blow to him.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Injuries

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23672 of 2023(4) dt.08-08-2023 2/2 sustained by the informant are simple in nature as per para 124 of the case diary. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 22.4.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioner is having eight criminal antecedents. It is mentioned in para 92 of the case diary, that two gun shot injuries were received by Parmanand Kumar and informant had received three incised injuries and three lacerated injuries over scalp, caused by hard and blunt substance.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His application for bail stands rejected The trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U