Ravikant Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5173 of 2025 ====================================================== Ravikant Yadav Son of Kuldeep Yadav Resident of B.R.M. College Road, Madhopur, P.S.- Basdeopur, District- Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Addl. Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Addl. Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director Higher Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Munger University, Munger through its Registrar. 5.
The Vice Chancellor, Munger University, Munger. 6.
The Registrar, Munger University, Munger.
7.
The Balmiki Rajniti Mahila College, Munger through its Principal. 8.
The Principal, Balmiki Rajniti Mahila College, Munger. ... ... Respondents.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Standing Counsel (18) For the Munger University : Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajan Prakash, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the case record, it appears that the petitioner vide various representations had approached the respondent authorities for regularizing his services. Despite representations and directions from the office of the Hon'ble Chancellor, the case of the petitioner was never considered.
3. In such view of the matter, I direct the petitioner to
Patna High Court CWJC No.5173 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/2 file a fresh representation before the Registrar Munger University, Munger (respondent no.6) within a period of four weeks and respondent no.6, after receipt of such representation, shall dispose it of within a period of four weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order.
4 It is made clear that respondent no.6 shall be liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period as aforesaid.
5. With the direction aforesaid, this writ application stands disposed of.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U