← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/21006/2014disposed

Harish Chandra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-08-10Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21006 of 2014 ====================================================== Harish Chandra Prasad S/o Late Pepali Sah Resident of Chauk Chauraha Guru Govind Singh Path, P.S.-Chauk, District-Patna-800008, retd. Panchayat Sachi Bhargava Block Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Administrator, Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board, Patna Patna Bhavan, Patna.

3.

Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Govt. of Bihar, Patna New Secretariat Building, Patna.

4.

Agricultural Production Commissioner, Department of Agriculture Govt.of Bihar, Patna, New Secretariat 5.

Secretary Expenditure, Department of Finance Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariate, Patna.

6.

District Magistrate, Araria.

7.

Block Development Officer, Bhargama Araria 8.

District Panchayati Raj Officer, Araria.

9.

Joint Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tilak Sao, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2023 1.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.(i) For the grant of the differences of salary for the period 2.9.08 to 31.1.10 (for 17 months) due to the order passed under Annexure No. IV, V in the compliance of the Honb'le High Court order as contained under Annexure no. III to it along with the interest thereon from the due date to the date of actual payment and

Patna High Court CWJC No.21006 of 2014(2) dt.10-08-2023 2/2 the cost of the case, when the petitioner is adjusted to the Department of Panchayati Raj after dissolving his parent Department Bihar Agricultural Marketing Board, Patna on low basis of pay scale."

2.

The learned counsel for the respondentState submits, by referring to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 7, especially paragraph no. 4 thereof, that the admitted outstanding arrears/difference of salary for the period 02.09.2008 to 31.01.2010 has already been deposited in the bank account of the petitioner apart from payment of all the other admissible dues to the petitioner, hence the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

3.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U