← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23424/2024bail granted

Munna Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-02Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23424 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2024 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ====================================================== Munna Sahni, son of Bilas Sahni Resident of Village- Baligaon, P.S.- Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jeetendra Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the allegation is of recovery of 425 litres of liquor from a place near bank of a river at Baligaon Ghat.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar. In most of the cases, innocent persons are being implicated by the police either at the instance of Chaukidar or local people. It is thus submitted that if the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23424 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/2 Chaukidar was aware about the involvement of the petitioners in the occurrence, then why he did not inform the police earlier and why the said fact was disclosed after the liquor is alleged to have been recovered, which cast an aspersion on the case of the prosecution, when admittedly petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 3rd Exclusive Special Excise Court, Saran at Chapra in connection with Parsa P. S. Case No.12 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T