Ankit Yadav @ Ankit Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19833 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2022 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger ====================================================== Ankit Yadav @ Ankit Raj, S/O Sachchidanand Yadav, Resident of VillageBank, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jyoti Ranjan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-05-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 281 of 2022 dated 04.08.2022 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 379, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the coaccused persons are alleged to have caught hold of the informant due to non-payment of the due amount of milk. The petitioner inflicted blow of Tangi on the head of the informant causing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19833 of 2023(2) dt.22-05-2023 2/2 broken injury.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. He has further submitted that there is no repetition blow on the informant so Section 307 is not made out against the petitioner. The petitioner is accused in four other criminal cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2022. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the informant sustained injury which is grievous in nature. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Munger in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 281 of 2022. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T