Bibi Salima Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18542 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2018 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

BIBI SALIMA KHATOON Wife of Mustakim Mian 2.

Jahir Mian Son of Mustakim Mian. Both are resident of Village - Gurwalia, Kachahari Tola, P.S.- Manua Pul, Distt.- West Champaran. 3.

Sudama Devi Wife of Manager Yadav. Resident of Village - Nuniawa, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- West Champaran.

4.

Santosh Yadav Son of Langtu Yadav 5.

Baidyanath Yadav Son of Langtu Yadav. Both resident of Village - Pakdihar, P.S.- Chanpatia, District- West Champaran.

6.

Manajar Yadav Son of Late Dhenuk Yadav. Resident of Village - Nuniawa Tola, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- West Champaran. 7.

Satyanarayan Yadav Son of Sri Yadav. Resident of Village - Satwaria, P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran.

8.

Sher Mohammad Mian @ Shermohammad Miya Son of Alimohammad Mian. Resident of Village - Turhapatti, Raje War Rai, Purab Mukhiya ke Tola, P.S.- Sirisia, O.P. District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Hari Shankar Yadav @ Shankar Yadav Son of Late Sukhdeo Yadav. Resident of Village - Gurwalia, Tola, Siwala, P.S.- Manua Pul, District- West Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Kumar Shrivastva For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 466, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 18542 of 2019(2) dt.27-03-2019 2/2 According to complaint based allegation, the petitioners in collusion with each other created a forged sale deed in respect of the property of the complainant. Submission is that both sides are agnates and there is property dispute and just to pressurize, complaint case has been filed.

Considering the disputed question of fact, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Bettiah Muffasil (Manua Pul) Police Station Case No.294 of 2018, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully co-operate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Birendra Kumar, J) abhishek/- U T